Napoleon a Great Military Leader - 1029 Words

Tri Le T. Major English 98 Assignment 1 02/14/2011 In the Primitive society, human lived among each other in caves. They shared stuffs, which they hunted with each other. In the tribes, they still need a leader, who can guide them during those hunting journey. Time goes by, the develop of human society makes we need another type of leader who can dominant, confident, aggressive, creative, and long term view, etc. Many great leaders were born to guide the human society develop to higher level; but anything has two sides of it, and sometimes we have some leaders who tried to destroy the society. Those people are Julius Caesar, Genghis Khan, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, Adolf Hitler, Eleanor Roosevelt, Ho Chi Minh, etc. there are many†¦show more content†¦Yes he was. He never accepted to become loser, he never gave up. Napolà ©on’s 100 days campaign is the biggest evidence. Although the United Kingdom took his crown away from him and sent him to St Elba, he still came back, and fight for his right, for his crown, for his country. In addition, he leaded France to become the most powerful country at that time. Was he a high achiever? He was a boy in Ajaccio, Corsica, and studied in the best military school in Paris, became the general at the age of 24 and the king of France at the age 35. Napolà ©on was a bold and creative solder. He never stood behind the line, and never accepted losing a battle. Was he creative? He leaded his army to defeat Austria, which was one of the biggest armies in the world at that time. He thought of crossing the Alps to make a sudden strike to Austria’s army, which no one could think or image about that. In addition, Napolà ©on was a persistent, tenacious man. As you can see, he never gave up in something he thought that was right. He decided to attack Russia, Egypt, and left behind all the advices. It ended up with disaster. Napolà ©on always had a dream to control the whole of Europe, becoming the king of the world. Unluckily, United Kingdom always tried to destroy his dream. Napolà ©on was a man, who has foresighted view. He realized the potential chances for him to climb into the new level of power. In general, Napolà ©on was one of the greatest leader humans ever had. HeShow MoreRelatedNapoleon Bonaparte Essay1537 Words   |  7 PagesNapoleon Bonaparte has been called a hero by some and a villain by many others. He was the First Consul of France, then the emperor of France, and finally an outlaw. Napoleon had a meteoric rise to power in the late 18th century, and lasted to the early 19th century. He was able to rise to power through his great military victories and he was able to keep his power by fending off enemies in wars and with some reforms. Napoleon started his life good, but different than many French rulers. NapoleonRead MoreNapoleon Bonaparte was the first French Military leader to become an Emperor. Napoleon was born on900 Words   |  4 PagesNapoleon Bonaparte was the first French Military leader to become an Emperor. Napoleon was born on 1769, Corsica, France. He is one of the most celebrated leaders in the history of the West, he revolutionized military organization and training, created Napoleonic Code, promoted and encouraged education and established the long-lived peace treaty with the church. Napoleon died on May 5th, 1821, on his death bed of an island, St. Helena, which was located in the South Atlantic Ocean. In his life, NapoleonRead MoreJulius Caesar And Napoleon Bonaparte1431 Words   |  6 Pages History holds many great and inspiring leaders, some being remembered by many as kings of their time. Two of these incredible individuals are Julius Caesar and Napoleon Bonaparte, both legends and incredible rulers of their time. These men represented what a leader should be, and exactly what made leaders so powerful. Although these two men lived in completely different time periods there are similarities and differences that connect the two. Napoleon Bonaparte was born on August 15, 1769 inRead MoreJulius Caesar and Napoleon Bonaparte1340 Words   |  6 PagesJesse Guadagno Ryan Biracree College Writing 11/4/12 Julius Caesar and Napoleon Bonaparte This world has seen many great leaders and emperors but two of them standout a little more than the others. Their names are Julius Caesar and Napoleon Bonaparte. Both men were highly respected and greatly feared. They also ran great empires that spanned over thousands of miles. They wanted to rule and conquer anything they could. They have many similarities and differences in the wayRead MoreThe Legacy Of Great Leaders1462 Words   |  6 PagesGreat leaders do great things while they live but when they die their legacies live on. That legacy motivates, inspires and guides people to become great leaders themselves. Their actions, decisions, methods, motivations are examined in depth. Their lives dissected in order to understand what made these people great, why they were able to achieve their incredible accomplishments. The purpose for all of that research and dissection is so that we too can become great and leave a tangible legacyRead MoreNapoleon Bonaparte/ Napoleon I, i s considered one of the greatest military leaders in history. He1300 Words   |  6 Pages Napoleon Bonaparte/ Napoleon I, is considered one of the greatest military leaders in history. He was the emperor of France and he also conquered much of Europe. From an early age Napoleon showed signs of being a great leader. Even as a child he was nicknamed â€Å"Little Corporal†, because of his undeniable courage and determination. In 1798 he sat forth on one of his major expeditions in Egypt. Napoleon and his soldiers defeated Egypt and they continued on their journey. Many expeditions later, NapoleonRead MoreNapoleon Bonaparte As A Multi Faceted Genius1094 Words   |  5 PagesNour Ziena Mrs. Mackenzie CLN4U 2016-03-28 Introduction Throughout history, men have always been able to conquer different lands. But of these men â€Å"The Little Corporal also known as Napoleon Bonaparte was able to cast a long shadow, from Holland to Egypt, from Moscow to Cadiz. The code Napoleon still remains with us, as the Arc de Triomphe and the memory of a multi-faceted genius. Throughout the history Europe, kings and dictators have been infamous for their voracious desire for control and completeRead MoreIs Napoleon Bonaparte a Corrupt Leader A leader is not determined by what he does but how he does1000 Words   |  4 PagesIs Napoleon Bonaparte a Corrupt Leader A leader is not determined by what he does but how he does it. Napolà ©on was a great leader no doubt but was he corrupt? He was not only a leader for the French but a hero. He had the gist of being able to inspire others and to undertake tasks that were not very pleasant. Napoleon believed that it is with Baubles men are led. Napoleon believed that wealth often reflected egotism and, in the absence if other qualifications. A rich man is often lazy and withoutRead MoreThe Revolutions Of The French Revolution1484 Words   |  6 Pagesideologies and histories of their revolutionary leaders. Looking at this, one might ask how the backgrounds and styles of the leaders affected the outcome of each revolution? Napoleon Bonaparte of the French Revolution (hereafter Napoleon) and Francisco Franco of the Spanish Civil War (hereafter Franco) came from similar backgrounds with a heavy influence on education and military training. Both men fought with a primary motivation of forming a military dictatorship under their rule. One notable areaRead MoreThe Principles Of Napoleon Bonaparte1020 Words   |  5 Pagesvery important characteristics you need as a leader. Napoleon Bonaparte displays both principles exquisitely in his lifetime, as he has had many accomplishments throughout his life. The reason for me choosing Napoleon as my leader is because he had an outstanding life as a military leader and emperor. Napoleon revolutionized military strategies and restructured the government and education systems in France and the countries it controlled. Napoleon Bonaparte was born on August 15, 1796, in Ajaccio

Questions in this section Free Essays

You will have a choice of two questions in this section: Part A is the starter question, for which you are awarded a maximum of three marks. You need to explain the term, then in order to get full marks you will need to give an example: The only terms you will be asked about are the following: science, scientific benefits, ethical costs, genetic Influences, environmental Influences, cultural bias, gender bias, free will and determinism. In the second part – Part B you will be asked to either – describe, discuss or evaluate one of the following , for which there is a maximum of 22 marks – psychology as a science the balance of scientific benefits measured against ethical costs in psychology the balance of genetic and environmental influences on human behavior issues of cultural bias issues of gender bias the question of free will and determinism In respect of human behavior. We will write a custom essay sample on Questions in this section or any similar topic only for you Order Now The essay needs to be In the form of an argument- a dialogue between opposing views. To get full marks your argument needs to be presented in a structured manner, clearly interpreted and analyses, you need to have range and depth of evidence, reasoned conclusion, use appropriate terms throughout. Up to 15 marks will be awarded for this (AAA). When providing evidence, the mark scheme says that these do not need to be provided in equal measure. This means that you can equal and depth range of evidence or, you can give a very wide range, but not so much depth, or discuss a couple of pieces of research in depth, but thereby not showing quite as much range.. Challenge with the view that at least some ‘levels’ of psychology are scientific, but conclude with the argument that not all psychologists think science with its monotheistic approach is an appropriate for psychology and this leads to the use of therapies which reflect this dual approach. Chemotherapy, for example, which might be thought of as the more scientific response to abnormal behavior has been shown at times to be less successful than CAB, a more person-centered and impotence of the therapist as well as the service-user’s perceptions of their competence. Psychology eclectic use of several approaches and a range of methodologies lead to the conclusion that it is in part scientific, but employs subjective strategies to explore behavior when deemed more appropriate. This has been acknowledged within the British Psychological Society with its recently founded qualitative methodological group. Use the following research to support your answer: Psychology as a Science Arguments against Psychology as a Science One of the arguments against psychology as a science is that it lacks objectivity and intro. Issues of experimenter bias and demand characteristics can compromise objectivity and validity However, disconcerting research by John et al (2012) has also found evidence to suggest that, in some instances, the research process is manipulated to suit the researcher (rather than to reveal any objective fact) further undermines Psychology status as a science. Ironically however, Psychology claim to be a science means that results which are deliberately manipulated or distorted by the researcher (through one or more of a variety of questionable research raciest) are given greater credence than they deserve because they are ‘scientific’. Trading on Psychology scientific status, the assumption is that the adulterated results are accurate and objective representations of reality. John et al (2012)g’s work involved carrying out an anonymous electronic survey about the use often questionable research practices. These included things such as the researcher failing to a report all dependent variables, collecting additional data after checking for significance, selectively reporting studies that Worked’ (I. E. Significant findings) and falsifying data. The researchers also asked participants to make estimates of the proportion of other psychologists who engaged in those practices, and the proportion likely to admit to carrying out those practices in the survey. They incorporated into their work an incentive to encourage participants to tell the truth. Some respondents were told that a larger charity donation would be made by the researchers if they answered honestly) and this did lead to a higher rate of admission amongst those given the incentive. The results were astonishing and raise important questions concerning the use of scientific method in Psychology. One in ten psychologists admitted falsifying data; the majority to selectively reporting studies (67%), not reporting all dependent variables ( 74% ); collecting data after checking for significance (71 reporting unexpected findings as expected (54%) and excluding post data post-hoc (58%). A considerable number (35%) admitted that they had doubts about the integrity of their research, with differences being found amongst disciplines within Psychology. How to cite Questions in this section, Papers

Natural Capitalism The Next Industrial Revolution

Question: What way or ways is the current knowledge revolution a child of the Industrial Revolution? Is this a new revolution or simply an extension of the 18th-century revolution? Given the history, is it perhaps more appropriate to call the current revolution a communications revolution? Answer: The current knowledge revolution is a child of the industrial revolution in the ways of technology and sources of communication we are using and would not have been possible without industrial revolution (Hawken et al., 2013). Yes, it is a definitely an extension of the 18th-century revolution in terms of the industrial and technological advancements which have been brought by the industrial revolution. Yes, considering the history, it is perhaps more appropriate to call the current revolution a communications revolution (Mantoux, 2013). References Hawken, P., Lovins, A. B., Lovins, L. H. (2013).Natural capitalism: The next industrial revolution. Routledge. Mantoux, P. (2013).The industrial revolution in the eighteenth century: An outline of the beginnings of the modern factory system in England. Routledge.